Croft Defends Verstappen's Rules Crusade As Montoya Calls For Points
Formula 11 June 20262 min read

Croft Defends Verstappen's Rules Crusade As Montoya Calls For Points

Sky commentator David Croft has backed Max Verstappen's long-running criticism of F1's 2026 rules, praising his consistency, while Juan Pablo Montoya argues the champion should be hit with seven penalty points for it.

Should a driver be punished for criticising the rules he races under? Formula 1's commentary box is split on the question, and Sky's David Croft has planted himself firmly behind Max Verstappen, even as others suggest the champion should be docked points for the very same outspokenness.

Talking to Motorsport, Croft praised Verstappen for having the courage to challenge the 2026 regulations and to hold his line rather than soften it from race to race. The thrust of his argument was consistency: Verstappen says what he believes and does not bend the message week to week.

Croft also noted that the Red Bull driver's unhappiness has survived a change in fortunes. Even after taking his first podium of the season in Canada, Verstappen stayed openly critical of the current rules, which to Croft signals conviction rather than frustration born of a poor result.

Most importantly, Croft argued, Verstappen was raising the alarm well ahead of his peers. He traced the scepticism to 2023 and the emergence of the move towards a 50/50 power split for the new engines, pointing out that Verstappen doubted it would work then and remains unconvinced now.

"I don't think they're idle threats just for politics," Croft said. "He's stayed very consistent for the last two to three and a half years that he doesn't agree."

That endorsement could hardly be further from the most severe response Verstappen's remarks have provoked. Juan Pablo Montoya went the other way completely, suggesting the criticism was grave enough to merit sanction and that Verstappen deserved seven penalty points on his super licence purely for speaking out against the rulebook.

The chasm between those views reflects a deeper divide in the sport. One school sees a serial champion using his standing responsibly to flag concerns about the racing that plenty of fans quietly echo. The other fears that a figure of Verstappen's influence publicly rubbishing the regulations damages the championship and should carry a price.

The strength of Croft's case rests on the timeline. Verstappen's objections did not start when results dried up; they predate the 2026 machinery altogether, going back to the moment the technical path was chosen. For a driver who has just rejoined the podium places and may yet influence the title fight, that track record is difficult to dismiss as bitterness.

Whether the people who write the rules are paying attention is a separate question. But with figures as respected as Croft backing him, Verstappen's complaints are increasingly hard to wave away, however much his critics would prefer to see him sanctioned rather than heard.